Has anyone independent evaluated this resource?

Give the paper that introduced a resource. WhoChecked walks the works that cite it, ranks them by how much they read like an evaluation, and shows how many authors each shares with the original. It reports what it found and how; it does not decide whether the resource is good, or whether a paper is an evaluation.

A title is a best guess, and the report says so. A DOI or an arXiv id is exact.

Checks are rate-limited: at most 30 papers an hour, shared by everyone. How the limits work.

Try an example

Or read a sample report without running anything.